Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1666 14
Original file (NR1666 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7o1 8S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

HD
Docket No. NR1666-14
5 May 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

subj: YN? Sy

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref; (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 1 Nov 13 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 8 Apr 14 w/attachment

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for
16 March 2012 to 15 February 2013 (copy at Tab A).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Lippolis and Storz,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

8 May 2014, and pursuant to its requiations, determined that the

corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, requlations and

policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
fo Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants

favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
Following enlisted performance report and related material:

Period of Report

Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

7 May 13 er 215 Feb 13

b. That there be inserted in his record a memorandum in place
of the removed report, containing appropriate identifying data
concerning the report; that the memorandum state that the report has
been removed by order of the Secretary of the Navy in accordance with
the provisions of federal law and may not be made available to
‘gelection boards and other reviewing authorities; and that such
boards may not conjecture or draw any inference as to the nature of

the report.

c. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic tape
or microfilm maintained by NPC.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a

part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(¢c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board‘’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

VG bo flare
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy. |
Reed S, I :

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3355 14

    Original file (NR3355 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following enlisted performance evaluation report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 14 Nov 12 16 Nov 11 15 Nov 12 b. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3499 14

    Original file (NR3499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2011 to 25 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2336 14

    Original file (NR2336 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Gorenflo and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 June 2014, and pursuant toits regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSTON : Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. e. That any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13

    Original file (NR7444 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13

    Original file (NR933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2968 14

    Original file (NR2968 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was offered continuation to a date that allows him the opportunity to gain eligibility for Reserve retired pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8793 14

    Original file (NR8793 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing or modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2011 to 15 dune 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1574-13

    Original file (NR1574-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the adverse enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2010 to 29 Aprii 2011, reimbursing ail forfeitures awarded at his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 17 May 2011, removing all documentation of the NUP and granting him special consideration for advancement to ENCS (pay...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08408-98

    Original file (08408-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 1 April 1995 to 15 March 1996. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pauling, Schultz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 May 1999, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1415 13

    Original file (NR1415 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Spain and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error ana injustice on 15 May 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured compliance with...